Frequently Asked Question
Proxmox VE (KVM + LXC)
A mature, popular open-source virtualisation platform (KVM for VMs, LXC for containers) with a strong web UI, clustering, HA, Ceph integration, snapshots, and a big community—commonly adopted as a “get off VMware” option.
- Pros
- Very strong feature set for the cost (HA, live migration, snapshots, integrated backup tooling ecosystem).
- Flexible storage options (ZFS, Ceph, iSCSI/NFS, etc.).
- Broad hardware compatibility and lots of real-world operational knowledge in the community.
- Vendor and Third Party support options.
- Cons
- Direct Support is via subscription tiers.
- Some VMware-to-Proxmox migrations require more planning/validation (drivers, tooling differences).
HPE Morpheus VM Essentials
HPE’s VMware-alternative stack combining KVM-based virtualisation with Morpheus-style management/automation. Positioned for organisations wanting a more “enterprise vendor” route with unified workload management and lifecycle operations.
- Pros
- Vendor-backed approach; aligned to enterprises that want support, roadmaps, and a single throat to choke.
- Emphasis on centralised management and automation (particularly relevant in mixed/hybrid environments).
- Designed as a VMware alternative with an “operations” lens, not just a hypervisor.
- Cons
- Newer offering relative to Proxmox/Hyper-V; smaller community footprint and fewer long-lived field patterns.
- Pricing and packaging can be less transparent than Proxmox.
- Practical fit can depend on how much you value the Morpheus management layer vs “just virtualisation.” which is open-source.
Microsoft Hyper-V (Windows Server Datacenter)
Microsoft’s hypervisor, typically consumed via Windows Server Datacenter licensing for virtualisation-heavy hosts. Best fit when you’re already a Windows shop and want tight integration with Microsoft management/security tooling.
- Pros
- Excellent fit for Microsoft-centric environments (AD, Windows Server, System Center, Azure Arc, etc.).
- With Datacenter licensing, you get unlimited Windows Server VM rights on properly licensed hosts (often the economic driver).
- Mature platform with long enterprise history.
- Cons
- The economics depend heavily on whether your guests are Windows Server and how you license cores.
- Linux support is fine, but the platform is still most compelling in Windows-first estates.
- Feature/UX preferences vary; some teams find it less “turnkey” than VMware for certain workflows.
- It's Microsoft.
Approximate pricing
Scenario: 3 nodes × 2 sockets each (6 sockets total), 30 cores per node, ~30 guests total.
Key caveats (important):
- Proxmox and HPE VM Essentials are commonly priced per socket per year (subscription/support).
- Hyper‑V itself is included with Windows Server, but in practice you price Windows Server Datacenter (licensed per physical core) to get unlimited Windows Server guest rights.
- Exact GBP will vary by reseller discounts, support tier, and exchange rates.
Pricing table (GBP, approximate)
| Option | Pricing basis used | Calculation for your setup | Approx annual cost (GBP) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proxmox VE (Standard subscription) | ~€550 / socket / year | 6 sockets × €550 = €3,300/yr | ~£2,800/yr |
| HPE Morpheus VM Essentials | ~$600 / socket / year | 6 sockets × $600 = $3,600/yr | ~£2,900/yr |
| Microsoft Hyper‑V via Windows Server Datacenter | per physical core (license in 16‑core packs, varies by channel) | 3 nodes × 30 cores = 90 cores total ⇒ typically 96 cores worth of licenses (round up to 16‑core packs) | ~£30k–£45k one‑off (plus Software Assurance if you want upgrade rights) |
In Summary
For businesses looking to move away from VMware without the high overhead of proprietary licensing, Proxmox VE stands out as the most compelling choice because it offers a mature, enterprise grade feature set, including built-in high availability, live migration, and integrated backup, at a fraction of the cost of its competitors.
While Microsoft Hyper-V is the natural path for Windows-heavy shops, its licensing complexity and core-based pricing can quickly become expensive, and while HPE VM Essentials provides a solid vendor-backed alternative, it lacks the massive, battle-tested community ecosystem that Proxmox has built over the years, and under the hood it's open-source virtualisation.
Ultimately, if an organisation is comfortable managing a Linux-based hypervisor or outsourcing support for it, then Proxmox provides the best balance of flexibility and stability; it allows you to avoid vendor lock-in and "breaking the bank" on per-core or per-socket taxes, provided you value a platform that is open, highly customisable, and supported by a global network of experts.
